Untitled design (1)

Do Wikipedia Backlinks Carry any SEO Weight?

Wikipedia presents a unique challenge in the realm of SEO. On one hand, it stands as a colossal and authoritative platform with a global presence, serving as a primary source of information in numerous languages. However, its open editing system, allowing anyone with an account to make changes, creates a dilemma for search engines like Google.

While one might assume that gaining backlinks from Wikipedia, given its authority, would significantly boost a site’s ranking, the issue lies in the potential for manipulation. Since anyone, including the owner of the linked site, can add a link to a Wikipedia article, Google faces the challenge of distinguishing genuine recommendations from self-promotion.

This situation parallels the problems associated with private blog networks and interlinking between owned sites. Google cannot consider a link as a reliable source of authority if it originates from the very owner of the linked site. This concern also poses challenges for Wikipedia, as it could become inundated with low-quality pages filled with links.

To address these SEO challenges proactively, Wikipedia has implemented a nofollow attribute across the entire site. Even links to verified authorities are marked as nofollow, rendering them valueless from a pure SEO perspective. While this might lead one to dismiss the significance of Wikipedia backlinks, the intricacies of the issue make it worthy of discussion.

In essence, the question of whether Wikipedia backlinks are beneficial for SEO receives a nuanced answer due to the nofollow attribute, challenging conventional assumptions about the impact of links from authoritative platforms.

The True Value of Wikipedia for Marketing

Wikipedia holds considerable potential value for a website, although not in the conventional SEO sense. While links from Wikipedia may not contribute to link juice, they offer positioning and authority by establishing a website as a cited source in a Wiki article.

A common approach to leveraging Wikipedia for your site involves creating your own Wiki page. Crafting a well-cited, informative page about your company, including details about its history, CEO, mergers, and other relevant information, can potentially gain traction. A prime example is Verizon’s comprehensive Wikipedia page, which features an overview, detailed history, business lines, marketing campaigns, corporate structure, and more. Despite being a larger corporation, the principles apply to smaller businesses seeking a presence on Wikipedia.

Smaller businesses may face challenges in creating a robust page, given their limited history and scope. A less informative page may not resonate well with Wikipedia users, and sourcing information solely from your own website is generally discouraged. Notably, even high-profile individuals like Neil Patel experienced challenges, with his Wikipedia page deleted due to the perception of being overly promotional and lacking a balanced perspective.

Considering the value of a Wikipedia link in terms of social authority and brand recognition, the question arises: is creating a dedicated Wikipedia page necessary? Alternatively, smaller businesses may find success with mentions on more generic pages, such as those listing marketing companies or pages focused on specific techniques, where they serve as illustrative examples. This approach can still offer visibility and credibility without the need for an extensive dedicated page.

Wikipedia’s Notability Requirements

To secure a dedicated page on Wikipedia, one must successfully navigate the platform’s notability test, which is based on a set of guidelines determining whether a topic merits its own article. Failing to meet these notability requirements can result in the inability to create a page or the removal of an existing one. Here are key considerations and exclusions outlined by Wikipedia:

  1. Verifiable Information: The content on the page must be verifiable through third-party sources not affiliated with the topic.
  2. Exclusions:
    • Wikipedia is not a dictionary and discourages pages dedicated to definitions, dictionary entries, or slang and idiom guides.
    • It is not a platform for original thought, research, personal essays, inventions, or firsthand creations. Notable content should be published elsewhere, with citations on Wikipedia if it becomes noteworthy.
    • Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, and activities such as propaganda, self-promotion, advertising, and marketing are strictly prohibited.
    • It is not a mirror for links, images, or media. External links are limited, with a preference for internal links.
    • Wikipedia is not a blog, web host, social network, or memorial site. Content falling into these categories will be removed.
    • It is not a directory, rejecting sales catalogs, genealogical entries, family trees, yellow or white pages, and similar content.
    • Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, journal, or textbook. Game guides, FAQs, and travel guides are not allowed.
    • It is not a “crystal ball,” disallowing speculative content.

While there are additional guidelines, the primary focus is on presenting factual information about noteworthy or notable subjects, such as people, places, and events. Brands considering a Wikipedia page should carefully assess their notability and ensure they can adhere to these guidelines. Attempting to create a page without meeting the criteria may lead to content removal, and subsequent additions may face heightened scrutiny due to a known history of attempting marketing through Wikipedia.

Getting Yourself on Wikipedia

Getting a mention or link on Wikipedia without creating a dedicated page can be achieved through several strategies. Here are some effective approaches:

  1. Perform a Site-Wide Search: Before taking any action, search Wikipedia to see if your brand is already mentioned. If it is, you can use this existing mention as a starting point for expanding your presence.
  2. Broaden Mentions on Other Sites: Engage in a PR campaign to garner mentions on high-profile sites that are not affiliated with your brand. Avoid using guest posts on sites where you’re directly involved, as Wikipedia may consider such sources biased or promotional.
  3. Consider Starting with a Stub: Instead of a full article, some suggest beginning with a stub. This basic entry signals that you believe your brand may be noteworthy, without appearing overly promotional. When creating a stub, use a username that doesn’t directly link to your company, and consider using a proxy for anonymity.
  4. Avoid Obvious Traces: Be cautious about transparency. If the username or IP address used to edit the Wikipedia page is easily traced back to your company or CEO, it may raise suspicions. Maintain a level of anonymity, especially during initial contributions.
  5. Encourage Third-Party Links: Whenever possible, have third-party links supporting your content. Source information from external sites rather than relying solely on your own. Even if you’re providing company history, include links to third-party verifiable sources.
  6. Stimulate Collaboration: A stub can serve as a challenge for Wikipedia editors to expand the content. Encourage collaboration by allowing multiple contributors to work on the page. This can lend credibility and prevent the appearance of a single biased source.
  7. Monitor Discussion Pages: Keep an eye on the discussion page associated with your content. Respond promptly to concerns, questions, or requests for improvement. Demonstrating a commitment to enhancing content quality can help build a positive relationship with Wikipedia editors.

By following these strategies and adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines, you can increase the likelihood of obtaining a mention or link on the platform without the need for a dedicated page. It’s crucial to approach this process transparently, ethically, and with a genuine commitment to contributing valuable and unbiased information.

Alternatives to Wikipedia

Wikia, now known as Fandom, indeed provides a platform for creating niche wikis that mimic the Wikipedia format. These wikis are particularly suited for topics that may not be notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia but are valuable within specific communities.

However, the success and usefulness of these wikis heavily depend on community engagement. Some wikis may suffer from neglect and have limited content, making them less useful or even obsolete. On the other hand, well-maintained wikis with active communities can become valuable resources for niche topics.

For instance, while marketing.wikia.com is an example of an underutilized domain, the entrepreneur wiki demonstrates the potential for a focused database of information about individual entrepreneurs. The effectiveness of these wikis often hinges on the level of community involvement and the dedication of contributors to keep the content updated and relevant.

Creating a wikia variant for your industry or niche is an option, but it comes with significant responsibilities. Establishing and maintaining a wiki requires substantial effort, and success depends on ongoing community support. Merely creating a wikia and hoping for it to thrive without active engagement and content management is unlikely to yield positive results.

In summary, while niche wikis have the potential to be valuable resources, their success is contingent on sustained community involvement and a commitment to keeping the content current. Founding a wikia variant can be an option, but it demands ongoing dedication and effort to make it a worthwhile and thriving resource.

Share this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Signup our newsletter to get update information, news, insight or promotions.

Related Article